Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '18 at 15:14
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 96.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 222
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2981) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1567 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.8% Good
Lighting 84.3
Reflection 83
Parallax 77
69% 81.4 fps
MRender 84.1
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 71
63% 77.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505CUA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 472
Write 239
Mixed 285
73% 332 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 11.6
56% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 7.5
72% 171 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB
53GB free
Firmware: AXM08D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 253
Write 246
Mixed 245
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 8.28
46% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 72.9
DQ Mixed 7.67
29% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback