Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory	3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120124
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '16 at 12:36
Run Duration	795 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 187 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 459 50% 395 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3925 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1005 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6113 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1003 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 958 (C2) HDA temperature 105 98 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.6% Average	Read 83.9 Write 82.5 Mixed 50.5 54% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.15 4K Write 0.48 4K Mixed 0.13 30% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 65%
Seagate FreeAgent 2TB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 509GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9% Terrible	Read 29.3 Write 20.3 Mixed 9.28 22% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.03 5% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 19%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 482GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 20.8 Mixed 25.7 32% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.46 62% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1TB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 389GB free, PID 3101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 19.7 Mixed 10.6 21% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.34 62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent 2TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 221GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 24.6 Mixed 24 33% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.29 58% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent 2TB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 143GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 21.9 Mixed 11.3 24% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.25 50% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 19%
Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1TB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 132GB free, PID 3101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 20.5 Mixed 12.2 24% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.23 53% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB 1,223 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 117GB free, PID 2100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 29 Write 21.2 Mixed 13.4 25% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.16 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 18%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 100GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 18.5 Mixed 12.2 23% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.28 51% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,597 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 65GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 19.4 Mixed 10.8 23% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.26 51% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 4GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 8.76 Mixed 9.84 14% 13 MB/s	4K Read 3.92 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.92 95% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Samsung M391B5673FH0-CH9 6GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 13.1 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P900 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	84x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	66x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	39x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	22x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	18x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 88 samples	9x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 PSD34G1600L81 PSD34G1600L81 12GBSamsungBench 37%, 7 samples	5x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16