Asrock QC5000M-ITX/PH

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock QC5000M-ITX/PH (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '18 at 11:04
Run Duration	474 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5050 APU 244 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 51.6 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 48.1 28% 41.2 Pts	4-Core 94.3 8-Core 94.9 13% 94.6 Pts	64-Core 96.7 6% 96.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 9832) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 2.28 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 3.3 2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer A S350 120GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP71 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 80 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (A3) Unknown 100 100 3 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 312697355	30.7% Below average	Read 288 Write 67.7 Mixed 93 32% 150 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 5.42 39% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 57.7 DQ Mixed 5.93 26% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 66%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 412GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 138 4016 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2031 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9700 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1980 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 179 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1851 (C2) HDA temperature 102 91 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.4% Very good	Read 132 Write 117 Mixed 130 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.39 94% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 69%
WD U MHZ23 External 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 35GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 20.5 Mixed 23.3 30% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.33 62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 14%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB 427 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 2.96 Mixed 4.42 7% 7.66 MB/s	4K Read 3.43 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.002 13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5471-058.A00LF 1x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QC5000M-ITX/PH Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000M-ITX/PH

CPU
A4-5050 APUAMDBench 31%, 244 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	1x

RAM
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 43%, 1,169 samples	1x
CT25664BD160B.C8FN 2x2GBCrucialBench 35%, 22 samples	1x
99U5403-491.A00LF 2x8GBUnknownBench 14%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16