Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140526
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	May 04 '18 at 19:49
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80 3,108 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 89.9 44% 68.6 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 177 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Lighting 68 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 57.6 55% 63.8 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 67.8 55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 56%
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 4.53 3% 4.48 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 3.96 3% 3.64 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX 128GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.6 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 11 0 (0C) Power cycle count 191 2 0 (B8) Unknown 88 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 2 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 111 250 353943 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 146 183093 (C8) Write error rate 254 52 4783 (C9) Soft read error rate 243 178 2097 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 5 121 238 (CB) Run out cancel 57 81 212 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 136 19 0 (CE) Flying height 174 2 0 (CF) Spin high current 156 6 0 (D0) Spin buzz 141 5 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 72 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0 (D4) Unknown 0 0 0 (D5) Unknown 0 0 0	31.4% Below average	Read 227 Write 166 Mixed 167 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 6.19 40% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.1 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 6.39 7% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 36%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 25GB free Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2791 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1946 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 190371 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 12471739 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 3126474659 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	29.3% Poor	Read 251 Write 78.5 Mixed 120 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 5.41 44% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 72.7 DQ Mixed 44.7 34% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-004.A00LF 99U5471-003.A01LF 99U5458-004.A00LF 99U5471-003.A01LF 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.3 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	10x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
SP900 256GBAdata $300Bench 74%, 9,430 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	1x
99P5471-004.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 601 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16