Asus E35M1-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus E35M1-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120806
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	May 12 '18 at 09:06
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Memory 38.8 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 20 19% 25 Pts	4-Core 23.1 8-Core 23.2 3% 23.2 Pts	64-Core 14.3 1% 14.3 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84A5) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.19 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.04 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 9TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2.5TB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.9% Excellent	Read 599 Write 525 Mixed 596 128% 573 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 18.9 84% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 36.7 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 15.1 18% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 116%
Maxtor 6L300S0 300GB-$45 2,416 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: BACE1G20 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 181 179 24139 (04) Start/Stop count 251 251 4331 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 12 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 250 0 (08) Seek timer performance 249 231 44172 (09) Power-on hours count 33 33 63227 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 252 252 648 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 253 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 3563 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 197 2 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 240 240 156 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 125 0	31.1% Below average	Read 51.4 Write 55.4 Mixed 42.1 37% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.25 142% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 3,471 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.27% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 1.3 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.4 4% 1.37 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 7.27% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E35M1-M PRO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus E35M1-M PRO

CPU
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	2x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	1x

SSD
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x
240GB SATA SSD 240GBPNYBench 71%, 495 samples	1x

RAM
CM3B4G1C1600L9 2x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 417 samples	1x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 11,344 samples	1x
9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 2,152 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369