Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory36.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '18 at 07:18
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 232
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 660
66% 538 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 30.5
35% 34.3 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 36.6
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 1,114
Write 302
Mixed 456
136% 624 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 19.6
84% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 48.6
63% 120 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 155%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 109
Write 154
Mixed 115
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 87.8
Write 85.3
Mixed 78.6
63% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.18
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
91GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 41.6
Write 48.5
Mixed 38.9
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.27
60% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 40GB
2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $631
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback