Fujitsu CELSIUS M770power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M770power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3498-A1
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '18 at 09:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2125
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 277
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 774
84% 665 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.33
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 9.12
5% 8.51 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 9.93
Splatting 14.9
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HAJQ-00007 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 206Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 511
Write 498
Mixed 510
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 34
112% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 58.5
DQ Mixed 19.3
22% 36 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 161
Mixed 158
126% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.17
83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 18.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 11.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M770power Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M770power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback