Asus N53Jq

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus N53Jq (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N53Jq
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101105
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '16 at 19:39
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 91.5 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 82.4 50% 72.3 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 226 24% 190 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1522) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5354 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 3.92 Parallax 2.97 3% 3.44 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 3.63 Splatting 2.48 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 642 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 918 (A5) Unknown 100 100 12899385518 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 37 (A8) Unknown 100 100 17 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 77 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 44 188979740701 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 352191250514 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 601 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1652 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1185 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2060 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	36.6% Below average	Read 232 Write 160 Mixed 164 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 10.8 43% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 38.4 45% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 101%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 355GB free Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 91 90 2858 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3317 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1376 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1736 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 49 223339151386 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 15 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 5 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 20050	58.2% Above average	Read 98.8 Write 104 Mixed 98.5 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.34 94% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BF160B.C8FE 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 859B CT25664BF160B.C8FE 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.8% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N53Jq Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N53Jq

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	42x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	2x
Core i7 X 940Intel $150Bench 60%, 592 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	45x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	5x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	4x
480GB SATA SSD 480GBPNYBench 80%, 729 samples	3x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	5x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 3x2GBAsintBench 36%, 71 samples	4x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16