Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 17 '16 at 03:37
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 133
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 226
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 17
Parallax 20.1
19% 20 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 17
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 272
Write 114
Mixed 149
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 11.2
88% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 10.5
22% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 73%
MD3640GSATA 640GB
499GB free
Firmware: 05.01G.6 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 136
Mixed 122
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.21
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.4
143% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback