Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 7,922 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Memory 23 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 68.6 24% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 104 14% 102 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 3,569 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1B8D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.01% Terrible	Lighting 3.87 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 5.84 3% 5.13 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.35 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.01% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 337GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 337 342 351 370 372 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 396 Write 374 Mixed 362 SusWrite 347 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 24.9 82% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 210 154% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 30%, 7,922 samples	28x
FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 36%, 2,236 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	21x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	19x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,569 samples	7x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GBHynixBench 18%, 886 samples	23x
HMT451S6DFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GBHynixBench 18%, 242 samples	6x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 12GBSamsungBench 19%, 146 samples	5x