HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory27.3 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080505
Uptime5 Days
Run DateApr 20 '16 at 11:16
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 35.1
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 63.9
26% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 201
20% 164 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
228GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 84.9
Write 64
Mixed 71.6
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.38
103% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
149GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 89.6
Write 84.6
Mixed 7.29
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.32
91% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 76%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 146GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 180
Mixed 178
135% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 5.82
4K Mixed 1.13
265% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback