Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '18 at 20:14
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 660 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 49% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 146 53% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 204 28% 205 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E113) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.53 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 170 169 176 181 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.2% Above average	Read 214 Write 207 Mixed 189 SusWrite 178 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 27 101% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 42.4 74% 145 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 59GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 75 74 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 75.5 Write 74.3 Mixed 52 SusWrite 74.3 51% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:85 9B CT25664BA160B.C8F ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:85 9B CT25664BA160B.C8F 44GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.2% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 13.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16