Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory	6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '18 at 13:41
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 173 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 269 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 77%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 480 480 480 481 482 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 479 Mixed 407 SusWrite 480 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 48.6 160% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A-PB 2x4GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.2% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	17x
T600NvidiaBench 29%, 1,270 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 56%, 161 samples	7x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 24GBHynixBench 54%, 16 samples	6x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 199 samples	6x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $706

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16