Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5690 4,873 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 93.5 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 182 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 562 57% 463 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 34.2 28% 31 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 31.9 Splatting 31.2 27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 46 49 53 57 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 179 Write 187 Mixed 35 SusWrite 52.3 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.8% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
1x33GB^Y[fXfPV(@XZBench 31%, 36 samples	12x
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 37GBUnknownBench 43%, 9 samples	7x
HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GBHynixBench 49%, 6 samples	6x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158