Today's hottest deals

Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TP67B+  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 18:04
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 110
2-Core 205
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 552
52% 431 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 38.1
33% 36.6 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 36.5
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 147 113 100 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.1% Good
Read 245
Write 236
Mixed 184
SusWrite 124
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 40.5
134% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 47.2
40% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$50
20GB free
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 147 113 100 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 242
Write 330
Mixed 223
SusWrite 126
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 29.6
108% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 99.9
DQ Mixed 38.4
37% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 63 50 62 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 60.7
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 96%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 50 62 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 143
Write 136
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 60.5
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 105%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.7 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Read 13
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.3
8% 7.18 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 7%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
506GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.85% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 2.8
18% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.85%
Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EARX-22PASB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 28.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 20.2
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
TOSHIBA HDWD120 2TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 22.2
Write 25.5
Mixed 26.7
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.3 MB/s
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
506GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 22.6
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $786
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback