PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 46GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 46GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | EVGA Classified SR-2 (all builds) |
Memory | 20.5 GB free of 46 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101028 |
Uptime | 5.7 Days |
Run Date | Aug 22 '18 at 01:41 |
Run Duration | 222 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 89 87 95 87 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
142GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 116 115 118 118 118 MB/s
|
48.7%
Average
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
172GB free
Firmware: 04.04V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 108 107 107 106 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
6GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 73 71 77 63 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
994GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 95 94 95 95 MB/s
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 148 146 149 166 156 MB/s
|
95.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 108 105 82 96 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 14x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples | 5x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 Fury-XAMD $781Bench 59%, 8,241 samples | 6x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $922 |