Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory10.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 16:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 73
2-Core 178
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 502
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 58.5
34% 46.9 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 34.1
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 53 46 46 51 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 345
Write 61.8
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 46.2
26% 122 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 12.8
43% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
587GB free
Firmware: JC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 106 105 105 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 94
Write 101
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 105
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$81
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 188 181 189 179 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 178
86% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.7
329% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 110%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
25GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 23 16 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 77.8
Write 30
Mixed 37
SusWrite 21.8
49% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.8
183% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M Kingston KVR648-PSB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.3% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback