Today's hottest deals

MSI X79A-GD45 Plus (MS-7760)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7760
MotherboardMSI X79A-GD45 Plus (MS-7760)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '16 at 01:29
Run Duration416 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 515
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2981) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5286
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 72
64% 77.7 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 65.9
58% 71.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State 480GB
423GB free
Firmware: 12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 534
Write 512
Mixed 506
116% 517 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 14.9
128% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 69.1
124% 242 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Samsung PM800 2.5" 128GB
79GB free
Firmware: VBM25D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 205
Write 171
Mixed 193
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 6.42
47% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 8.74
DQ Mixed 5.17
6% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 32%
Samsung PB22-JS3 FDE 2.5" 128GB
74GB free
Firmware: VBM9LD1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 209
Write 136
Mixed 157
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 9.12
4K Mixed 6.55
47% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 8.4
DQ Mixed 5.15
6% 9.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%
Samsung PM800 2.5" 128GB
3GB free
Firmware: 5D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 216
Write 99.9
Mixed 118
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 9.36
4K Mixed 6.5
50% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 8.47
DQ Mixed 6.45
8% 14 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 32%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63% Good
Read 118
Write 102
Mixed 103
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.21
92% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63%
Great: 83%
Crucial_CT240M50 240GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 160
Mixed 191
150% 200 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 1.47
249% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
hp v165w 4GB
4GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 6.22
Mixed 8.01
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.45
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.006
24% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.7
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79A-GD45 Plus (MS-7760) Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI X79A-GD45 Plus (MS-7760) - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $742
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback