Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory124.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 22:22
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.00GHz
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 142
60% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 565
50% 422 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 116
Parallax 99.6
91% 109 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 104
Splatting 106
84% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 1143 1153 1150 1162 1155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 1,166
Mixed 734
SusWrite 1,061
244% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 53
186% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 404
306% 415 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 196%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
141GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 469 471 473 474 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 474
Mixed 335
SusWrite 441
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 40.1
139% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 152
170% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
340GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 725 1149 1510 1514 1514 1515 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,550
Write 1,497
Mixed 992
SusWrite 1,321
301% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 53.2
180% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 429
324% 437 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 218%
Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
447GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1093 1514 1513 1514 1514 1512 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,557
Write 1,493
Mixed 1,000
SusWrite 1,443
309% 1,373 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 52.4
178% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 386
290% 389 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 223%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 60
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 48.4
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 16
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 119%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback