HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory26.4 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 01:38
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5672
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 152
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 638
57% 482 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 32.2
33% 34.9 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 36.7
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 119 121 121 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 118
SusWrite 118
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 20.8
63% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 95.3
72% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 134%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
19GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 145 126 134 136 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 173
Write 146
Mixed 138
SusWrite 135
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 25.6
88% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 32.6
31% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 45%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST3000DM001-9YN166 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 205 200 203 205 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 161
Mixed 89
SusWrite 202
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 116%
Great: 104%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72
184GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 176 177 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 190
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 176
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.6
306% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72
279GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 195 192 195 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 192
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 194
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.6
302% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback