Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCYB3V1E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSony VPCYB3V1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 18:11
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 40.9
28% 39 Pts
4-Core 40.4
8-Core 41
5% 40.7 Pts
64-Core 40.9
2% 40.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sony(104D 9082) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
358GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 63 61 63 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 67.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 62.4
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 43%
FUJITSU MHZ2160BH G1 160GB
64GB free (System drive), PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 23 28 26 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.3% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 26.9
Mixed 23
SusWrite 26.8
36% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SNY1333D3S9DR8/2G Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.6
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCYB3V1E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCYB3V1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback