Asus B85M-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150923
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '18 at 11:03
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 93.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 362 51% 377 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 8390) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 19.4 18% 22.2 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 23.4 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$84 9,168 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 151 108 211 95 121 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.2% Average	Read 63.7 Write 55.5 Mixed 110 SusWrite 152 22% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 21.4 77% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 74.4 94% 167 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 100%
Storejet Transcend 960GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 894GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 266 269 275 282 285 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 361 Write 323 Mixed 303 SusWrite 270 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 17.7 67% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 88.8 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 31.5 49% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 89%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 23GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 62 62 64 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 72.8 Write 60.7 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 62.3 45% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 478GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 90 92 95 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 78.5 Write 66.2 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 92 53% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 411GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 91 82 77 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 64 Write 63 Mixed 52 SusWrite 80.4 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 61GB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 89 91 90 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.8% Above average	Read 149 Write 152 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 89.8 153% 117 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 156% 4.73 MB/s

TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 177GB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 89 91 90 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.8% Above average	Read 147 Write 152 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 89.7 150% 115 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 159% 5.07 MB/s

TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 1.5TB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 89 91 90 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.1% Above average	Read 185 Write 180 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 89.8 171% 133 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 160% 5.37 MB/s

TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 1.5TB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 89 91 90 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.8% Average	Read 130 Write 136 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 89.9 139% 106 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 150% 4.27 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600G 4x4GB 434 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	62.9% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 19.5 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-GAMER Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	128x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	82x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	66x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16