Average Bench: 54% (92nd of 115)

Based on 77,652 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 2x8GB

Average average bench

The HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB averaged 46.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 19.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 19.4GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB is 31.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.3GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 16.6GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 77,652 samples)
Min Avg Max
10.6 MC Read 19.4 22.5
9.85 MC Write 19.5 23.2
9.3 MC Mixed 17.2 20
53.5% 18.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.1 SC Read 14.3 18.2
7.1 SC Write 17 23.1
8.85 SC Mixed 16.6 21
45.6% 16 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.2 Latency 74.2 108
53.9% 74.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 8.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
77,652 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,623,605 RAM Kits tested

Typical Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB Builds (Compare 6,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $788

Popular Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4070 $530Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback