PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150121 |
Uptime | 13.9 Days |
Run Date | Aug 29 '18 at 18:52 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 180 171 184 173 177 MB/s
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$130
143GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 165 164 154 152 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
716GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 165 164 154 152 MB/s
|
78.3%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BD1339.M16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 299x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 232x |
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 72x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 95x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $144Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $169 |