Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory1.1 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 30 '18 at 15:58
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 87.5
44% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 88
8-Core 90.4
12% 89.2 Pts
64-Core 85
5% 85 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570
Nvidia(10DE 0474) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.19
Parallax 0.38
1% 0.46 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.41 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 98 97 100 92 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 220
Write 113
Mixed 129
SusWrite 101
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 15.6
62% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 64.6
59% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD153WI 1.5TB
181GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 86 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 61.7
Write 90.7
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 86
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 62%
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB
28GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 85 84 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 85.2
Write 82.3
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 83.8
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 57%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 4 3.8 5.1 4.5 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Read 7
Write 5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.7
9% 6.43 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.9
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback