Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 152 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 207 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310 4,147 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 9060) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.52 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 0.13 1% 1.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 440GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 262 261 258 258 261 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 CM3X2G1333C9 Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 64C0MHHHJ-HS 10GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.2% Below average	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 12.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 938 samples	42x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	31x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	21x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16