Today's hottest deals

Asus V-P8H67E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus V-P8H67E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V-P8H67E
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 22:06
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 199
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 369
52% 384 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 121
Parallax 104
94% 114 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 101
Splatting 101
82% 99.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 190 185 136 134 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 370
Write 194
Mixed 225
SusWrite 164
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 17.4
95% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 18.8
29% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 72%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
168GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 401 372 365 357 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 404
Write 400
Mixed 321
SusWrite 359
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 42
139% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 41
DQ Write 99.2
DQ Mixed 57.5
47% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 134%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 32
Write 12.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 27.9
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-041.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V-P8H67E Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P8H67E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback