Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP900X4D-A02NL
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '18 at 15:39
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 36.2 29% 38.9 Pts	4-Core 51.9 8-Core 56 7% 54 Pts	64-Core 54 3% 54 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 2.43 1% 1.68 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 2,350 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT41K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 75 64 65 73 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 315 Write 52.5 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 76.9 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 10 43% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 50.9 DQ Mixed 46.2 47% 78 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	42x
Core i7-3537UIntelBench 52%, 17,065 samples	35x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	132x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	26x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	25x
MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 987 samples	19x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BFU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 27%, 317 samples	40x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	29x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16