Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P5GC-VM/SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5GC-VM/SI (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '18 at 19:31
Run Duration	479 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 42.1 2-Core 85 43% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 82 8-Core 84.6 11% 83.3 Pts	64-Core 80 5% 80 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$99 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.01E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 51 49 46 37 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 54.6 Write 48.4 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 40.1 34% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 33%
IC35L090AVV207-0 80GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 74GB free Firmware: V23OA66A SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 52.2 Write 54.4 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 52.3 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 30%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 14GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 51 49 47 41 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 83.4 Write 82.4 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 42.4 42% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.1 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback