HP h9-1187

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h9-1187  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120702
Uptime15.8 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 22:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 489
53% 418 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 68.8
64% 76 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 75.5
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 188 192 190 195 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 457
Write 438
Mixed 371
SusWrite 216
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 35.6
119% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 124 124 128 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 48.5
Write 106
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 124
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
252% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1187 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP h9-1187

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback