Biostar Hi-Fi A88W 3D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi A88W 3D  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140306
Uptime23.9 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 03:10
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 84
42% 64 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 132
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 60
Parallax 85.8
43% 66.2 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 75.7
53% 62.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 560ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 68 63 67 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 64.8
Write 122
Mixed 154
SusWrite 66
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 27.4
100% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 92.2
DQ Mixed 37.1
35% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 84%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
14GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 115 117 114 118 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 209
Write 138
Mixed 174
SusWrite 117
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 32.1
112% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 93.1
DQ Mixed 43
39% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$53
199GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 115 116 115 118 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 320
Write 304
Mixed 158
SusWrite 117
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 22.1
87% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 43.1
38% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
166GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 63 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 65.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 66.5
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 107 106 107 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 131
Write 121
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 105
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 84%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 107 106 107 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 70
SusWrite 105
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 87%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
697GB free
Firmware: JA2OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 91 92 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 88.6
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 90.6
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F3-2133C11-8GXL 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi A88W 3D Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A88W 3D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback