Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20EF001SMS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20EF001SMS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EF001SMS
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 19:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 200
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 461
51% 400 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4414
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 6.94
3% 5.89 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 8.96
6% 7.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 465 458 463 419 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 409
Mixed 274
SusWrite 454
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 43.8
161% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 287
236% 336 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Kingston 9905428-427.A00LF Kingston 9905428-427.A00LF HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback