Acer Aspire E5-572G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-572G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HWS
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 22:54
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 508
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Acer(1025 0922) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9907
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11.7
13% 12.7 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 9.74
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0005SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,028
Write 58.6
Mixed 76.6
994% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 602
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.1
25,311% 201 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-123.A00LF 99U5469-041.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-572G Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-572G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback