Asus P8Q67-M DO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Q67-M DO  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 00:18
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 174
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 289
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 82.8
55% 69.3 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 74.5
53% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 14 12 13 15 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.3% Very poor
Read 102
Write 37.6
Mixed 26
SusWrite 15.8
10% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 6.7
32% 9.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 17.6
14% 19 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
62GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 98 99 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 104
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 98.6
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 55 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 66.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 54.4
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
5GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 16 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 21.7
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 19.4
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.4
240% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q67-M DO Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Q67-M DO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback