Asrock 870 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive18.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 870 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100914
Uptime22.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '16 at 15:43
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 98.6
50% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 183
21% 164 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 13.8
13% 14.4 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 16.7
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E120506a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.6% Very poor
Read 82.8
Write 38.1
Mixed 35.5
11% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 12.2
36% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 43.2
DQ Mixed 13
15% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 45%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
435GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 91.1
Mixed 91.5
70% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.18
4K Mixed 0.22
34% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-147.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback