Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7100-$99 1,343 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 13.9 2-Core 27.3 28% 35.2 Pts	4-Core 39.9 8-Core 39.5 5% 39.7 Pts	64-Core 37.6 2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 135M 34 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 01F9) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.23% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.26 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.39 0% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.23% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103 6,500 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.2a SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 123 100 132 102 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.2% Below average	Read 167 Write 150 Mixed 114 SusWrite 117 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 14.3 58% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 24.4 DQ Write 52.5 DQ Mixed 29.6 25% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 1.7 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	16x
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	14x
Core2 Duo T7100Intel $99Bench 33%, 1,343 samples	6x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	33x
Quadro NVS 135MNvidiaBench 0%, 34 samples	15x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	1x
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $306