Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K42JR
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '16 at 22:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 46.5
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 33.6
24% 33 Pts
4-Core 49.2
8-Core 43.6
6% 46.4 Pts
64-Core 47.9
3% 47.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040A) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 245
Write 226
Mixed 228
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 9.82
46% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 21.9
19% 28 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback