Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory81.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180202
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '18 at 17:41
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 143
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 662
64% 528 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 354.13
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 52.5
32% 44.2 fps
MRender 53.8
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 29
31% 39.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256 256GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 35 164 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 400
Write 222
Mixed 247
SusWrite 62.9
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 31.4
111% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 206
184% 281 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Samsung M393A1G43... 96GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 43.3
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback