Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '18 at 09:17
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 41.1
1-Core 31
2-Core 47.2
26% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 67.3
8-Core 87.3
10% 77.3 Pts
64-Core 79
5% 79 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 25.20.14003.1010
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 32.4
19% 27.5 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 31
23% 27.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 268 269 274 260 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 391
Write 262
Mixed 245
SusWrite 268
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 22.9
75% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 139
114% 164 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 128%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 8GB
4GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.6 3.2 3.8 3.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 12.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.7
7% 6.35 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
139% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme6 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback