Colorful iGame Z170 EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful iGame Z170 EXTREME  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful iGame Z170 EXTREME
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170105
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 17:41
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 592
78% 585 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
18GB free
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,710
Write 490
Mixed 423
189% 875 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 69.1
280% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,529
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 674
585% 898 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 273%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 153 149 139 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 495
Mixed 353
SusWrite 178
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 65.6
230% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 357
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 119%
Great: 115%
WDC WD5000BEKT-6 500GB
226GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
Read 88.6
Write 91
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 92.5
114% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8 7.4 8.1 7.3 8.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 29.2
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 8.5
33% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.8
127% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iGame Z170 EXTREME Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Colorful iGame Z170 EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback