Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 13:55
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 137
60% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 376
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB; Zotac Geforce 1060
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 70.6
61% 73.3 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 71.8
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,071
Write 2,278
Mixed 2,362
571% 2,570 MB/s
4K Read 198
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 68.7
421% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 388
251% 288 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$140
32GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 49 58 49 54 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 18.3
Write 44.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 52.8
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
99GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 73 74 74 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 61
Write 70
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 73.5
52% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
175% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
42GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 134 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 101
Write 96.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 132
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 96%
Samsung D3 Station 5TB
67GB free, PID 6126
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 139 149 145 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 70.2
Write 58
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 143
107% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 0.3
375% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
440% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB
13GB free, PID 6126
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 23
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 24
29% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 75%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 107 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 108
Write 94.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 105
125% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback