MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 20:29
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 545
73% 548 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.3% Good
Lighting 81.2
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 79.3
66% 80.9 fps
MRender 81.4
Gravity 75
Splatting 77.1
64% 77.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 144 156 166 162 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 507
Write 483
Mixed 397
SusWrite 168
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 41
157% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 112
121% 208 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 90%
Great: 93%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB
297GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 62
Write 59
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 62.4
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB
297GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 49.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 61.9
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $747
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback