Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 14:50
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 475
51% 403 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 68.3
60% 73.9 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 75.5
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 454 463 489 483 482 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
996GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 106 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 104
Write 98.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 106
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 83%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 220 228 222 220 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 215
Mixed 104
SusWrite 224
139% 190 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.7
390% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 127%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HP698650-154-KEB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback