Apple iMac13,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemApple iMac13,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FC02E91DDD3FA6A4
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime3 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 13:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 500
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680MX
Apple(106B 010D) 2GB
CLim: 719 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 32.5
20% 27.3 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 22.5
23% 29.5 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM768E 751GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM90A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 215 226 199 203 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 386
Write 356
Mixed 250
SusWrite 208
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 12.8
56% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 94
86% 137 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac13,2 Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Apple iMac13,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback