| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus G11CD-K (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK G11CD-K |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170608 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 27 '18 at 17:58 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 63% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.1%
Above average
|
58% 113 Pts
|
51% 389 Pts
|
26% 417 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.2%
Above average
|
52% 59.3 fps
|
50% 60.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 57 80 90 84 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
26% 119 MB/s
|
50% 18 MB/s
|
79% 142 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
869GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 205 211 212 212 212 MB/s
|
119%
Outstanding
|
121% 166 MB/s
|
172% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
52.5%
Above average
|
56% 19.4 GB/s
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
20% 200 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,736 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus G11CD-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 914x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 726x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 30x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 455x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 296x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 236x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $196 |