Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190403
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 17:53
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$140
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 781
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 110
Parallax 126
94% 117 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 118
Splatting 102
103% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,264
Write 1,817
Mixed 1,283
396% 1,788 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 79.8
264% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,247
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 1,053
793% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
793GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1081 1032 852 765 791 930 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 862
Write 1,064
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 909
217% 960 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 71.3
228% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,112
841% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 212%
Great: 303%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
12GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 105 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 108
Write 98.1
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 102
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 17.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback