Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190403
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '23 at 11:39
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	90% Outstanding	Memory 90.7 1-Core 124 2-Core 242 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 726 75% 604 Pts	64-Core 899 56% 899 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3731) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.6% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 110 Parallax 117 92% 113 fps	MRender 168 Gravity 113 Splatting 100 101% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,470 Write 2,262 Mixed 1,595 469% 2,109 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 80.4 262% 91.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,199 DQ Write 962 DQ Mixed 1,072 804% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140 12,308 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 671GB free Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1457 1120 1105 1097 952 757 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,060 Write 1,397 Mixed 1,207 SusWrite 1,081 269% 1,186 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 72.2 238% 89.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,294 DQ Write 1,051 DQ Mixed 1,243 911% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 303%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.1% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 19.9 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 16.2 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	240	24.5"	1920 1080	AUS25B3 XG258

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	220x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	142x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	113x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $328

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16