HP 430 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 430 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3674
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 06:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 82.8
41% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 133
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 3674) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 62 46 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 216
Write 195
Mixed 198
SusWrite 67.1
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 11.1
52% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 79.4
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 21.5
46% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 82%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
53GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 48 47 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 56.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 47.2
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 430 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 430 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback