Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '18 at 15:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6128
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 58.6
40% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 235
21% 176 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
PNY(196E 082E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 306.23
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 32 33 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 42
Write 34.3
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 35.5
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 62%
Adaptec Array 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 257 255 254 253 252 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-001.B00LF 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback