Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 12:55
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600-$129
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 265
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 758
80% 641 Pts
64-Core 720
44% 720 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 27.6
27% 27.8 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 30
Splatting 33.5
25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 314 313 313 293 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 461
Mixed 380
SusWrite 322
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 52.3
176% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 344
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
575GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 136 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 151
Write 118
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 136
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 029E CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback